One commercial steering picture across all functions

You are responsible for sales, marketing and service together, and you receive three reports that cannot be added up.

your tailored solution

The customer sees one company, your systems are three departments.

As CCO your job is the bracket: the customer experiences one company, not three departments. Your systems, however, have usually grown along the departments, and so every cross-cutting question ends in an alignment meeting.

That costs at the handovers. A lead from marketing loses its context on the way into sales. A service incident does not reach sales before they call the customer. And potential in the existing base stays undiscovered because nobody sees contract, usage and history together.

At the same time you are the one where the numbers are supposed to converge. As long as every department keeps its own definitions, every combined picture is an arithmetic exercise with footnotes.

What changes

The process follows the customer, not the org chart.

01

One steering picture

Sales, marketing and service on one data foundation with shared definitions.

02

Handovers without loss

A lead keeps its context, a service incident becomes visible in sales.

03

Base potential visible

Contract, usage and history together: cross-selling becomes plannable instead of accidental.

04

Processes instead of departments

The process follows the customer, not the org chart, in the system too.

What stands in the way…

If at least one of these points applies, an initial consultation is worthwhile.

  1. Three departmental reports that do not combine into one picture.
  2. Leads lose their context at the handover into the sales system.
  3. Service incidents reach sales only during the customer conversation.
  4. Potential in the existing base stays undiscovered because data sits apart.
  5. Every cross-cutting metric needs an alignment meeting.
Book a call
Two hands shift a tablet closer to a laptop on a dark table, a phone and a mug beside them, each screen showing blurred blocks.
How you measure it

The decisive numbers sit at the handovers, not inside the departments.

The decisive metrics sit at the handovers, not inside the departments: how many qualified cases pass from marketing to sales and how many of those get worked, how often a service incident leads to a sales activity, and how large the share of the existing base is in new business.

These numbers only become possible once the departments work on the same data. That is why, for this role, the shared data foundation is not one project among several but the precondition for steering at all.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions: CCO

How do we get one picture out of three reports?

Through shared definitions and a shared data foundation. As long as every department keeps its own calculation rules, every merged picture remains an arithmetic exercise; see Connected Data & Integrations.

Do all functions have to use the same system?

Not necessarily the same tool, but the same truth. What matters is which system leads per data object and that the handovers work without losing information.

Where is the fastest lever?

Usually at one handover: the lead handover from marketing to sales, or service incident to sales. Both are clearly bounded, measurable and effective within weeks.

How do we deal with departmental interests?

By settling the shared metrics before the system. Whoever agrees on definitions stops arguing about tools afterwards; that is the core of CRM Strategy & Process Design.

Where do we start?

With the handover that costs the most today. Which one that is, the NATIVE Assessment settles on the basis of your numbers.

Let’s work together

The first step towards an agent-native company.

In the NATIVE Assessment we develop a clear target picture and a business case that holds up, in four to eight weeks. Fixed price, no open-ended day rates.

David Schuh, CEO of Thorit
Rather talk first?
We get back to you personally.
Request a workshop